nemozone

a zone for no one and everyone :) Btw this blog is only for adults! Dieser Blog ist nur für Erwachsene!

The best Apple IOS and MacOS accessibility reading software for visually impaired people are VoiceOver and Zoom. VoiceOver is a built-in screen reader that describes what's happening on your device so you can navigate by listening and performing gestures[2][3][4]. It can speak what’s on the screen, and the text in documents, webpages, and windows. With VoiceOver, you can control your Mac with the keyboard, trackpad gestures, or a refreshable braille display. To customize VoiceOver, use VoiceOver Utility[3]. Zoom is a built-in screen magnifier that makes it easier to see what’s on the screen[3][4]. It offers additional screen magnification and screen reader features to the OS X operating system[4]. Ai Squared also offers a low-vision product called ZoomText Mac, which offers additional screen magnification and screen reader features to the OS X operating system[4].

Citations:

[1] https://www.apple.com/accessibility/vision/ [2] https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210076 [3] https://support.apple.com/guide/mac-help/vision-mchl67c83f41/mac [4] https://www.afb.org/blindness-and-low-vision/using-technology/using-computer/part-ii-experienced-computer-user-new-3 [5] https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/05/apple-previews-innovative-accessibility-features/ [6] https://www.reddit.com/r/accessibility/comments/lnxt02/ios_apps_for_the_blind_and_visually_impaired_i_am/

Hack the planet! :)

Click Here to Watch the Video

In an era where our every move is tracked and monetized by corporations, privacy has become a precious commodity. In a move to empower users and restore their digital autonomy, the Cult of the Dead Cow, an Infosec super-band, has unveiled Veilid (pronounced vay-lid), a groundbreaking open-source project that promises to revolutionize the way applications communicate. Veilid enables apps to connect and exchange information in a secure and private peer-to-peer manner, free from the grasp of centralized, corporate-owned systems. In this blog post, we'll dive into the details of Veilid and how it could be a game-changer in the fight against surveillance capitalism.

The Birth of Veilid

Katelyn “medus4” Bowden and Christien “DilDog” Rioux recently presented Veilid at DEF CON, shedding light on the technical marvel that took three years to develop. This innovative system, primarily coded in Rust with contributions from Dart and Python, draws inspiration from both the Tor anonymizing service and the peer-to-peer InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). The fundamental idea behind Veilid is to enable applications on various platforms, including mobile, desktop, web, and headless, to communicate privately and securely over the internet, without revealing their users' IP addresses or locations.

Unlike traditional networking systems, Veilid ensures that even the app makers themselves cannot access this sensitive information. The project's design is well-documented and open-source, released under the Mozilla Public License Version 2.0, emphasizing transparency and community-driven development.

A Hybrid of Privacy and Performance

Veilid's uniqueness lies in its fusion of the best elements from Tor and IPFS. While Tor focuses on privacy but may suffer from performance issues, and IPFS leans towards decentralization without prioritizing privacy, Veilid strikes a delicate balance. Notably, unlike Tor, Veilid doesn't rely on exit nodes, making each node in the network equal. This makes it exponentially harder for any entity, including intelligence agencies like the NSA, to monitor Veilid users, as they would need to surveil the entire network.

As Rioux aptly puts it, Veilid is “like Tor and IPFS had sex and produced this thing.” The possibilities it opens up are limitless, with Bowden emphasizing the equality of all nodes and the strength of the network being as robust as its weakest link.

Key Features and Security Measures

Veilid operates by having each copy of an app that integrates the core Veilid library act as a network node. These nodes communicate with each other using 256-bit public keys as identifiers, ensuring that there are no special nodes or single points of failure. Veilid supports a wide range of platforms, including Linux, macOS, Windows, Android, iOS, and web apps, making it highly versatile.

Security is paramount in Veilid's design. It employs both UDP and TCP for communication, with connections authenticated, timestamped, end-to-end encrypted, and digitally signed to thwart eavesdropping, tampering, and impersonation. The cryptographic mechanisms, collectively referred to as VLD0, rely on well-established algorithms to avoid introducing vulnerabilities. These include XChaCha20-Poly1305 for encryption, Elliptic curve25519 for public-private-key authentication and signing, x25519 for DH key exchange, BLAKE3 for cryptographic hashing, and Argon2 for password hash generation. The system even ensures that files written to local storage are fully encrypted.

Flipping Off Surveillance Capitalism

In a world where IP addresses are sold, data is tracked relentlessly, and surveillance capitalism thrives, Veilid is a beacon of hope. It erases the need for IP addresses, prevents tracking, data collection, and monetization of user information. This is a significant stride toward dismantling the surveillance capitalism economy that profits from exploiting users' online activities.

As Bowden passionately states, “Billionaires are trying to monetize those connections, and a lot of people are falling for that. We have to make sure this is available.” The goal is for applications to seamlessly incorporate Veilid, allowing users to benefit from the network without needing to understand the technical intricacies. One notable example is VeilidChat, a secure instant-messaging app built using the Veilid framework, akin to Signal.

Conclusion

Veilid's release marks a significant step towards reclaiming digital privacy and autonomy. While previous attempts to challenge the surveillance capitalism economy have met with mixed results, the Cult of the Dead Cow's reputation for getting things right suggests that Veilid could be the catalyst for real change. With its commitment to security, privacy, and decentralization, Veilid has the potential to empower users and reshape the future of digital communication. As it gains momentum, it may well flip off the surveillance economy for good, putting the power back in the hands of the people where it belongs.

https://veilid.com/

https://gitlab.com/veilid/veilid

https://cultdeadcow.com/tools/

A tool to remove operating systems, whether Windows or Linux, with just one click.

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OS-Uninstaller

https://sourceforge.net/p/os-uninstaller/wiki/Home/

“Lull yourself to sleep with the soothing white noise of your favorite tech giant’s terms of service. Close your eyes, drift away, or scroll down to join the 1% of technology users that claim to have read em’ from beginning to end.*”

https://www.zzzuckerberg.com/

https://www.zzzuckerberg.com/zzzhang

Introduction

In a digital landscape dominated by commercial giants and advertisement-laden websites, it can be challenging to find authentic, community-driven resources. However, for those seeking a more genuine and ad-free experience, Indie Wiki Buddy comes to the rescue! This innovative browser extension aims to help users discover and support independent wikis on their favorite topics. Let's explore how this powerful tool works and how it empowers users to take control of their online knowledge journey.

Why Indie Wiki Buddy?

The rise of large wiki platforms has undoubtedly enabled the creation of numerous valuable wikis and thriving communities. While these platforms offer an excellent service, they can sometimes overshadow smaller, yet equally valuable, independent wikis. These independent wikis often provide readers with greater editorial independence, less clutter, and a more focused user experience.

Indie Wiki Buddy is on a mission to bridge this gap by guiding users towards independent wikis that align with their interests. Whether you're searching for gaming tips, cooking recipes, historical facts, or scientific knowledge, this extension helps ensure you find high-quality information curated by passionate and dedicated communities.

Features and Benefits

Redirect and Alert: When you visit a wiki hosted on major platforms like Fandom or Fextralife, Indie Wiki Buddy takes action! It either redirects you to a quality independent wiki or alerts you about its presence, giving you the choice to explore further.

Search Engine Filters: The extension also integrates seamlessly with popular search engines like Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, and Brave. It filters out non-independent wiki results and replaces them with a helpful message inviting you to visit the independent counterpart. This way, you're more likely to discover the hidden gems in the world of independent wikis.

BreezeWiki Integration: Indie Wiki Buddy further supports BreezeWiki, a service that enhances your reading experience on Fandom wikis by removing ads and clutter. This feature ensures a seamless transition between platforms, giving you an enjoyable browsing experience when an independent wiki is not available.

Taking Control with Indie Wiki Buddy

Installing and setting up Indie Wiki Buddy is a breeze. The extension is available for both Chrome and Firefox browsers. Once installed, you can access the settings popup through the icon on the top bar. From there, you can toggle the extension on/off, enable desktop notifications for redirects or BreezeWiki usage, and manage search engine result filters.

Additionally, the extension provides per-wiki settings, allowing you to customize your experience wiki by wiki. You can choose to be redirected automatically, receive alerts about independent alternatives, or filter search results for specific topics.

Supporting Independent Wikis

Indie Wiki Buddy currently supports over 100 independent wikis across seven languages, and the list continues to grow. If you come across a remarkable independent wiki that deserves recognition, you can submit it to be included in the extension.

The criteria for inclusion ensure that the wiki is truly independent, of decent quality, and has general interest appeal. This careful curation ensures that users are directed to reliable and valuable resources.

Conclusion

Indie Wiki Buddy empowers internet users to explore the world of independent wikis, fostering a greater appreciation for community-driven knowledge sharing. By promoting these hidden treasures and guiding users towards quality content, the extension plays a vital role in maintaining diversity and authenticity in the online information ecosystem.

So, if you're eager to step away from the noise of corporate websites and embrace the passion and dedication of independent communities, give Indie Wiki Buddy a try! Discover new perspectives, contribute to community-driven knowledge, and support independent wikis that make the internet a richer and more diverse place.

Remember, you can always support the development of Indie Wiki Buddy by contributing to its open-source project on GitHub or by buying a coffee for the dedicated team at ko-fi.com. Together, let's celebrate and preserve the spirit of independent knowledge-sharing!

https://getindie.wiki/

Introduction

The Western world has undergone significant transformations in its political and economic systems over the centuries. While many Western nations started as democratic societies founded on principles of liberty, equality, and representation, the 21st century has witnessed a profound shift towards what is often perceived as techno-surveillance neoliberal plutocracies. This essay will explore the factors contributing to this transition, including advancements in technology, economic ideology, and the rise of powerful elites, leading to a reconfiguration of governance and power dynamics.

Advancements in Technology

One of the central catalysts for the transition from traditional democracies to techno-surveillance neoliberal plutocracies is the rapid advancement of technology. The digital revolution has transformed the way societies operate, and governments have embraced technology to streamline administrative processes, enhance national security, and increase efficiency. While these technological innovations have undoubtedly brought numerous benefits, they have also given rise to a vast surveillance infrastructure.

Governments and corporations now have unprecedented access to individuals' personal data and digital activities, raising concerns about privacy and civil liberties. Surveillance technologies, such as mass data collection, facial recognition, and AI-driven monitoring systems, have become ingrained in daily life, enabling governments and corporate entities to exert extensive control over their citizens and customers.

Neoliberal Economic Ideology

The rise of neoliberal economic ideology has played a significant role in the transformation of Western democracies. Neoliberalism advocates for reduced government intervention in the economy, deregulation, privatization, and an emphasis on individualism and free-market principles. While neoliberal policies have fostered economic growth and innovation, they have also contributed to income inequality and wealth concentration.

In a neoliberal framework, corporations and wealthy elites have amassed enormous power and influence, often shaping government policies to serve their interests. The nexus of corporate influence over policy-making and economic policies that favor the wealthy has led to the rise of a plutocratic system, where the economic elite hold disproportionate control over the political landscape.

Influence of Powerful Elites

The concentration of wealth and influence in the hands of a few powerful elites has been a significant factor in the transition towards techno-surveillance neoliberal plutocracies. These elites, consisting of wealthy individuals, corporate leaders, and influential interest groups, wield tremendous power in shaping public opinion, influencing elections, and driving policy decisions.

Through lobbying efforts and campaign financing, these powerful interests can sway political outcomes in their favor, undermining the democratic ideals of equal representation and fair governance. As they prioritize their self-interests, the concerns and needs of the broader population often take a backseat, leading to a growing sense of disillusionment with democratic institutions.

Erosion of Democratic Values

The shift towards techno-surveillance neoliberal plutocracies has also been fueled by an erosion of democratic values and principles. As governments increase their reliance on surveillance technologies and tighten control over information, citizens' freedoms are curtailed. The line between legitimate security measures and unwarranted intrusion becomes blurred, fostering an environment where dissent and opposition can be stifled.

Moreover, the close ties between corporate entities and government officials raise concerns about conflicts of interest and a lack of transparency. The influence of money in politics undermines the democratic ideal of equal representation, creating a system that is increasingly favorable to the interests of the economic elite.

Conclusion

The transition from Western democracies to techno-surveillance neoliberal plutocracies has been a complex and multifaceted process. Advancements in technology, the rise of neoliberal economic ideology, and the growing influence of powerful elites have all contributed to this evolution. While some argue that these changes are necessary for economic growth and security, others raise valid concerns about the erosion of democratic values and the concentration of power in the hands of a privileged few.

As we navigate the challenges of the 21st century, it is crucial to strike a balance between technological progress, economic prosperity, and safeguarding democratic principles. Protecting civil liberties, promoting transparency, and fostering an inclusive political system that represents the interests of all citizens are essential steps towards addressing the issues arising from this transition. Only through collective efforts can we ensure that the Western world continues to evolve while upholding the values that form the foundation of our societies.

URLscan.io is a free service that simplifies website analysis and investigation by scanning and analyzing websites for potential threats. It records crucial information such as domains, IP addresses, resources, and page details during the browsing process. With its mission to provide an easy and confident means of scrutinizing potentially malicious websites, URLscan.io breaks down data into digestible chunks and focuses on providing valuable information for effective investigations. By empowering users with insights into website security, it enhances the efficiency of security measures and aids in proactive protection against cyber threats.

https://urlscan.io/about/

“The Matrix” (1999) – IMDb Rating: 8.7, IMDb ID: tt0133093 “Swordfish” (2001) – IMDb Rating: 6.5, IMDb ID: tt0244244 “Hackers” (1995) – IMDb Rating: 6.2, IMDb ID: tt0113243 “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” – (2011) IMDb Rating: 7.8, IMDb ID: tt1568346 “Mr. Robot” (2015-2019) – IMDb Rating: 8.5, IMDb ID: tt4158110 (TV Series) “The Social Network” (2010) – IMDb Rating: 7.7, IMDb ID: tt1285016 “Blackhat” (2015) – IMDb Rating: 5.4, IMDb ID: tt2717822 “WarGames” (1983) – IMDb Rating: 7.1, IMDb ID: tt0086567 “Tron: Legacy” (2010) – IMDb Rating: 6.8, IMDb ID: tt1104001 “Live Free or Die Hard” (2007) – IMDb Rating: 7.1, IMDb ID: tt0337978 “Sneakers” (1992) – IMDb Rating: 7.1, IMDb ID: tt0105435 “Enemy of the State” (1998) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt0120660 “Antitrust” (2001) – IMDb Rating: 6.1, IMDb ID: tt0218817 “The Terminator” (1984) – IMDb Rating: 8.0, IMDb ID: tt0088247 “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” – (1991) IMDb Rating: 8.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0103064 “Total Recall” – (1990) IMDb Rating: 7.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0100802 “The Italian Job” (2003) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt0317740 “The Prestige” (2006) – IMDb Rating: 8.5, IMDb ID: tt0482571 “V for Vendetta” (2006) – IMDb Rating: 8.2, IMDb ID: tt0434409 “Eagle Eye” (2008) – IMDb Rating: 6.6, IMDb ID: tt1059786 “The Code: Story of Linux” (2001) – IMDb Rating: 7.5, IMDb ID: tt0308808 (Documentary) “Independence Day” (1996) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt0116629 “Drive” (2011) – IMDb Rating: 7.8, IMDb ID: tt0780504 “Trance” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 6.9, IMDb ID: tt1924429 “The Great Hack” (2019) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt9358204 (Documentary) “Snowden” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt3774114 “Source Code” (2011) – IMDb Rating: 7.5, IMDb ID: tt0945513 “Interstellar” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 8.6, IMDb ID: tt0816692 “The Matrix Reloaded” (2003) – IMDb Rating: 7.2, IMDb ID: tt0234215 “The Matrix Revolutions” (2003) – IMDb Rating: 6.7, IMDb ID: tt0242653 “Inception” (2010) – IMDb Rating: 8.8, IMDb ID: tt1375666 “Zero Theorem” – IMDb Rating: 6.1, IMDb ID: tt2333804 “Upgrade” (2018) – IMDb Rating: 7.5, IMDb ID: tt6499752 “Animatrix” – IMDb Rating: 7.4, IMDb ID: tt0328832 “THX 1138” (1971) – IMDb Rating: 6.7, IMDb ID: tt0066434 “Brazil” (1985) – IMDb Rating: 7.9, IMDb ID: tt0088846 “The Cell” (2000) – IMDb Rating: 6.3, IMDb ID: tt0209958 “The Fall” – (2006) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0460791 “Cube” (1997) – IMDb Rating: 7.2, IMDb ID: tt0123755 “Akira” (1988) – IMDb Rating: 8.0, IMDb ID: tt0094625 “Primer” (2004) – IMDb Rating: 6.9, IMDb ID: tt0390384 “Pirates of Silicon Valley” (1999) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt0168122 “Jobs” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 5.9, IMDb ID: tt2357129 “The Imitation Game” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 8.0, IMDb ID: tt2084970 “The Fifth Estate” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 6.2, IMDb ID: tt1837703 “Phenomenon” (1996) – IMDb Rating: 6.4, IMDb ID: tt0117333 “Limitless” (2011) – IMDb Rating: 7.4, IMDb ID: tt1219289 “23” (1998) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt0126765 “The Truman Show” (1998) – IMDb Rating: 8.1, IMDb ID: tt0120382 “The Net” (1995) – IMDb Rating: 5.9, IMDb ID: tt0113957 “Blade Runner” (1982) – IMDb Rating: 8.1, IMDb ID: tt0083658 “Unfriended: Dark Web” (2018) – IMDb Rating: 5.9, IMDb ID: tt4761916 “Rebirth” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 5.0, IMDb ID: tt3231552 “Dark City” (1998) – IMDb Rating: 7.6, IMDb ID: tt0118929 “Existenz” (1999) – IMDb Rating: 6.8, IMDb ID: tt0120907 “Elysium” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 6.6, IMDb ID: tt1535108 “Death Machine” (1994) – IMDb Rating: 5.7, IMDb ID: tt0109575 “Beyond the Black Rainbow” (2010) – IMDb Rating: 6.0, IMDb ID: tt1534085 “Babylon A.D.” (2008) – IMDb Rating: 5.6, IMDb ID: tt0364970 “Real Genius” (1985) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt0089886 “Kung Fury” (2015) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt3472226 “xXx: Return of Xander Cage” (2017) – IMDb Rating: 5.2, IMDb ID: tt1293847 “Kim Dotcom: Caught in the Web” – (2017) IMDb Rating: 7.0/10 IMDb ID: tt3640710(Documentary) “The Accountant” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt2140479 “Tau” (2018) – IMDb Rating: 5.8, IMDb ID: tt4357394 “Metropia” (2009) – IMDb Rating: 6.3, IMDb ID: tt0985058 “High-Rise” (2015) – IMDb Rating: 5.6, IMDb ID: tt0462335 “Children of Men” (2006) – IMDb Rating: 7.9, IMDb ID: tt0206634 “They Live” (1988) – IMDb Rating: 7.3, IMDb ID: tt0096256 “Unfriended” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 5.5, IMDb ID: tt3713166 “Friend Request” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 5.3, IMDb ID: tt3352390 “Searching” (2018) – IMDb Rating: 7.6/10, IMDb ID: tt7668870 “Morgan” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 5.8, IMDb ID: tt4520364 “Transcendence” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 6.3, IMDb ID: tt2209764 “Vanilla Sky”(2001) – IMDb Rating: 6.9, IMDb ID: tt0259711 “Johnny Mnemonic” (1995) – IMDb Rating: 5.6, IMDb ID: tt0113481 “Banking on Bitcoin” (2016) – IMDb Rating: 6.6, IMDb ID: tt5033790 (Documentary) “The Congress” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 6.5, IMDb ID: tt1821641 “Tetsuo: The Iron Man” (1989) – IMDb Rating: 7.0, IMDb ID: tt0096251 “Summer Wars” (2009) – IMDb Rating: 7.5, IMDb ID: tt1474276 (Anime) “Snowpiercer” (2013) – IMDb Rating: 7.1, IMDb ID: tt1706620 “Savage” (1996) – IMDb Rating: 6.3, IMDb ID: tt0114339 “Naked Lunch” (1991) – IMDb Rating: 7.1, IMDb ID: tt0102511 “Mr. Nobody” (2009) – IMDb Rating: 7.8, IMDb ID: tt0485947 “Cypher” (2002) – IMDb Rating: 6.8, IMDb ID: tt0284978 “Equilibrium” (2002) – IMDb Rating: 7.4, IMDb ID: tt0238380 “Gattaca” (1997) – IMDb Rating: 7.8, IMDb ID: tt0119177 “The Giver” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 6.5, IMDb ID: tt0435651 “Judge Dredd” (1995) – IMDb Rating: 5.6, IMDb ID: tt0113492 “The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz” – IMDb Rating: 8.0/10, IMDb ID: tt3268458 “Soylent Green” (1973) – IMDb Rating: 7.1/10, IMDb ID: tt0070723 “A Beautiful Mind” (2001) – IMDb Rating: 8.2/10, IMDb ID: tt0268978 “The Social Dilemma” (2020) – IMDb Rating: 7.6/10, IMDb ID: tt11464826 “A Clockwork Orange” (1971) – IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0066921 “Conspiracy Theory” (1997) – IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0118883 “Solaris” (1972) – IMDb Rating: 8.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0069293 “2001: A Space Odyssey” – (1968) IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0062622 “Nothing to Hide” – (2017) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt7330532 “Steal This Film” – (2006) IMDb Rating: 6.4/10 IMDb ID: tt1422757 “Don't Look Up” – (2021) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt11286314 “The Interview” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt2788710 “In Bruges” – (2008) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0780536 “Everything Everywhere All at Once” – (2022) 7.8/10, IMDb ID: tt6710474/ “Minority Report” – (2002) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0181689 “Enter the Void” – (2009) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt1191111 “Blueberry” – (2004) IMDb Rating: 5.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0276830 “Adam's Apples” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0418455 “Nineteen Eighty-Four” – (1984) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0087803 “Metropolis” – (1927) IMDb Rating: 8.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0017136 “The Fifth Element” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0119116 “Citizenfour” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10IMDb ID: tt4044364 “Algorithm” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 4.7/10 IMDb ID: tt3293462 “Everything is one. Except for the 0” – (2020) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt11794022/ “Virus” (1999) – IMDb Rating: 4.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0120458 “Revolution OS” – (2001) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0308808 “We Are Legion: The Story of the Hacktivists” – (2012) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt2177843 “The Thirteenth Floor” – (1999) IMDb Rating: 7.0/10 IMDb ID: tt0139809 “Pi” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 7.4/10 IMDb ID: tt0138704 “Get Out” – (2017) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt5052448 “Sorry to Bother You” – (2018) IMDb Rating: 6.9/10 IMDb ID: tt5688932 “Sunshine” – (2007) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0448134 “Contact” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 7.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0118884 “Event Horizon”– (1997) IMDb Rating: 6.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0119081 “The Man from Earth” – (2007) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0756683 “The Man from Earth: Holocene” – (2017) IMDb Rating: 5.3/10 IMDb ID: tt5770864 “Good Will Hunting” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0119217 “Catch Me If You Can” – (2002) IMDb Rating: 8.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0264464 “The Edukators” – (2004) IMDb Rating: 7.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0408777 “Run Lola Run” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0130827 “Revolver” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 6.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0365686 “What Dreams May Come” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 7.0/10 IMDb ID: tt0120889 “Who Am I” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt3042408 “American Ultra” – (2015) IMDb Rating: 6.1/10 IMDb ID: tt3316948 “The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 6.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0371724 “The Faculty” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 6.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0133751 “Idiocracy” – (2006) IMDb Rating: 6.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0387808 “Dogma” – (1999) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0120655 “Office Space” – (1999) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0151804 “Oldboy” – (2003) IMDb Rating: 8.4/10 IMDb ID: tt0364569 “The Shining” – (1980) IMDb Rating: 8.4/10 IMDb ID: tt0081505 “The Cabin in the Woods” – (2012) IMDb Rating: 7.0/10 IMDb ID: tt1259521 “Split” – (2016) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt4972582 “One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest” – (1975) IMDb Rating: 8.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0073486 “Joker” – (2019) IMDb Rating: 8.4/10 IMDb ID: tt7286456 “Full Metal Jacket” – (1987) IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0093058 “Requiem for a Dream” – (2000) IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0180093 “Parasite” – (2019) IMDb Rating: 8.6/10 IMDb ID: tt6751668 “Alibi.com” – (2017) IMDb Rating: 6.4/10 IMDb ID: tt5592532 “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” – (2004) IMDb Rating: 8.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0338013 “Eraserhead” – (1977) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0074486 “Mulholland Drive” – (2001) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10 IMDb ID: tt0166924 “Lost Highway” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0116922 “Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0120669 “Being John Malkovich” – (1999) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0120601 “The Fountain” – (2006) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0414993 “Her” – (2013) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10 IMDb ID: tt1798709 “Modern Times” – (1936) IMDb Rating: 8.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0027977 “Identity” – (2003) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0309698 “Videodrome” – (1983) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0086541 “Cosmopolis” – (2012) IMDb Rating: 5.0/10 IMDb ID: tt1480656 “Kiss of the Dragon” – (2001) IMDb Rating: 6.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0271027 “Lucy” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 6.4/10 IMDb ID: tt2872732 “Alien” – (1979) IMDb Rating: 8.4/10 IMDb ID: tt0078748 “Star Wars” – (1977) IMDb Rating: 8.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0076759 “The Game” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0119174 “The Matrix Resurrections” – (2021) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt10838180 “Shutter Island” (2010) – IMDb Rating: 8.2/10, IMDb ID: tt1130884 “Donnie Darko” (2001) – IMDb Rating: 8.0/10, IMDb ID: tt0246578 “Fight Club” (1999) – IMDb Rating: 8.8/10, IMDb ID: tt0137523 “Memento” (2000) – IMDb Rating: 8.4/10, IMDb ID: tt0209144 “The Machinist” (2004) – IMDb Rating: 7.7/10, IMDb ID: tt0361862 “The Butterfly Effect” (2004) – IMDb Rating: 7.6/10, IMDb ID: tt0289879 “It” (2017) – IMDb Rating: 7.3/10, IMDb ID: tt1396484 “Perfect Sense” – (2011) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt1439572 “Songbird” – (2020) IMDb Rating: 4.8/10 IMDb ID: tt12592252 “Iron Sky” – (2012) IMDb Rating: 5.9/10 IMDb ID: tt1034314 “Cloud Atlas” – (2012) IMDb Rating: 7.4/10 IMDb ID: tt1371111 “Thank You for Smoking” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0427944 “The Insider” – (1999) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0140352 “Wag the Dog” – (1997) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0120885 “American Psycho” (2000) – IMDb Rating: 7.6/10, IMDb ID: tt0144084 “Matchstick Men” – (2003) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt0325805 “Pulse” – (2001) IMDb Rating: 6.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0286751 “Anon” – (2018) IMDb Rating: 6.1/10 IMDb ID: tt5397194 “A Scanner Darkly” – (2006) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0405296 “Awakenings” – (1990) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0099077 “12 Monkeys” – (1995) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10 IMDb ID: tt0114746 “Network” – (1976) IMDb Rating: 8.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0074958 “Free Guy” – (2021) IMDB Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt6264654 “Bloodshot” – (2020) IMDB Rating: 5.7/10 IMDb ID: tt1634106 “Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle” – (2004) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0366551 “Terms and Conditions May Apply” – (2013) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt2084953 “The Experiment” – (2001) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0250258 “Experimenter” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 6.6/10 IMDb ID: tt3726704 “HyperNormalisation” – (2016) IMDb Rating: 8.2/10 IMDb ID: tt6156350 “Can't Get You Out of My Head” – (2021) IMDb Rating: 8.5/10 IMDb ID: tt13973190 “All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace” – (2011) IMDb Rating: 8.1/10 IMDb ID: tt1955162 “The Century of the Self” – (2002) IMDb Rating: 8.8/10 IMDb ID: tt0432232 “The Dissident” – (2020) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt11382384 “The Big Short” – (2015) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt1596363 “Ghost in the Shell” – (1995) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0113568 “Running with the Devil: The Wild World of John McAfee” – (2022) IMDb Rating: 5.9/10 IMDb ID: tt21379574 M.C. Escher: Journey to Infinity – (2018) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt8297550 “Ex Machina” – (2014) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0470752 “Strange Days” – (1995) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0114558 “Momo” – (1986) IMDb Rating: 6.5/10 IMDb ID: tt0091537 “Persepolis” – (2007) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10 IMDb ID: tt0808417 “Waltz with Bashir” – (2008) IMDb Rating: 8.0/10 IMDb ID: tt1185616 “Two Pigeons”– (2008) IMDb Rating: 5.5/10 IMDb ID: tt5532370 “Chi-Raq”– (2008) IMDb Rating: 5.9/10 IMDb ID: tt4594834 “Dope”– (2015) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt3850214 “iHuman”– (2019) IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID: tt11279794 “Dr. Strangelove[…]” – (1964) IMDb Rating: 8.4/10 IMDb ID: tt0057012 “Lord of War” – (2005) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0399295 “War Dogs” – (2016) IMDb Rating: 7.1/10 IMDb ID: tt2005151 “Triangle of Sadness” – (2022) IMDb Rating: 7.3/10 IMDb ID: tt7322224 “Nope” – (2022) IMDb Rating: 6.8/10 IMDb ID: tt10954984 “They Cloned Tyrone” – (2023) IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID: tt9873892 “The Physician”– (2013) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt2101473 “Dark Waters”– (2019) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt9071322 “The G Word with Adam Conover”– (2022) IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID: tt13649532 “The Devil We Know”– (2018) IMDb Rating: 7.8/10 IMDb ID: tt7689910 “Dallas Buyers Club”– (2013) IMDb Rating: 7.9/10 IMDb ID: tt0790636 “Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media”– (1992) IMDb Rating: 8.1/10 IMDb ID: tt0104810 “The One Percent”– (2006) IMDb Rating: 6.9/10 IMDb ID:tt0819791 “Born Rich”– (2003) IMDb Rating: 6.5/10 IMDb ID:tt0342143 “Generation Wealth”– (2018) IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID:tt5268348 “Operation InfeKtion: Russian Disinformation from Cold War to Kanye”– (2018) IMDb Rating: ? IMDb ID:tt28288470 “Active Measures” (2018) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID:tt8135494 “The Yes Men Are Revolting” (2014) IMDb Rating: 6.7/10 IMDb ID:tt2531282 “The Yes Men Fix the World” (2009) IMDb Rating: 7.5/10 IMDb ID:tt1352852 “The Yes Men” (2003) IMDb Rating: 6.8/10 IMDb ID:tt0379593 “Dark Waters” (2019) – IMDb Rating: 7.6/10, IMDb ID: tt9071322 “Nightcrawler” (2014) – IMDb Rating: 7.8/10, IMDb ID: tt2872718 “Dark City” – (1998) IMDb Rating: 7.7/10 IMDb ID: tt0118929 “Interstate 60” – (2002) IMDb Rating: 7.2/10 IMDb ID: tt0308644 “The Crow” – (1994) IMDb Rating: 7.6/10 IMDb ID: tt0109506

TBC

Ach, was wäre die Welt ohne die Penthäuser, die großen Autos, die dicken Uhren, die allgegenwärtigen Symbole des Erfolgs! Doch schauen wir genauer hin, was verbirgt sich hinter dieser glitzernden Fassade? Ist es der Traum, der “Wolf” zu sein, oder ist es eher eine stille Verzweiflung, ein verzweifelter Versuch, nicht das “Schaf” zu sein?

In der heutigen Welt, die von den sozialen Medien beherrscht wird, sehen wir den Aufstieg des “Fake it till you make it”-Mindsets. Eine Welt, in der Maximilian und Mirko, die Protagonisten von Sebastian Hotz' “Mindset”, sich verzweifelt bemühen, die Wölfe zu sein, die sie so gerne wären. Doch sie sind keine Wölfe. Sie sind Männer, gefangen in einer Welt voller Hoffnungslosigkeit und Selbstbetrug, Männer, die mit aller Kraft versuchen, den Fängen der Realität zu entkommen.

Maximilian, der Mann hinter “Krach Consulting”, ist das perfekte Beispiel dafür. Auf Instagram präsentiert er sich als der ultimative Erfolg, mit Bildern von Penthäusern, großen Autos und dicken Uhren. Doch die Wahrheit? Das Penthouse ist nur ein Stockfoto, der Mercedes ein Leihwagen und die Uhr eine halbherzige Fälschung. Doch trotz all seiner hochstaplerischen Qualitäten, trotz seines “Fake it till you make it”-Mindsets, schläft er in seinem Büro in einem öden Gewerbegebiet auf dem Klappbett.

Und dann haben wir Mirko, der nach fast zehn Jahren im Job nicht mehr der Neue sein möchte. Inspiriert von Maximilians Instagram-Account, sehnt er sich danach, sein Leben spannender, sinnvoller, reicher zu machen. Doch was er nicht weiß, ist, dass Maximilian genauso ist wie er selbst, ein unsicherer junger Mann ohne Studienabschluss, der verzweifelt versucht, mit dem “richtigen Mindset” sein Leben zu verbessern.

Doch welchen Preis zahlen wir für diesen Traum, ein “Wolf” zu sein? Was geschieht, wenn die Fassade bricht und die Realität uns einholt? Maximilian, gefangen in seiner eigenen Illusion, trifft sich regelmäßig mit seinen “Jüngern”, verspricht ihnen den Erfolg, den er selbst so gern hätte. Dabei kann er sich kaum die Raummiete leisten, zieht sich in öffentlichen Toiletten um, um seinen Anzug zu schonen, und erlebt vor einem dieser Treffen eine Panikattacke. Er ist weit entfernt von dem Bild, das er in den sozialen Medien von sich präsentiert.

Und all dies führt uns zu einer tieferen Frage: Was bedeutet es wirklich, ein “Wolf” zu sein? Ist es, sich hinter einer Fassade zu verstecken und zu versuchen, der Realität zu entkommen? Oder ist es, die Verantwortung für unser eigenes Leben zu übernehmen, anstatt auf Traumgewinne aus Krypto-Währungen zu warten? Vielleicht ist es an der Zeit, dass wir aufhören, uns selbst zu betrügen,

und uns fragen, was wir wirklich wollen. Sind wir bereit, die harte Realität zu akzeptieren, dass der Weg zum Erfolg nicht durch die Präsentation einer gefälschten Realität in den sozialen Medien, sondern durch harte Arbeit, Durchhaltevermögen und Authentizität erreicht wird?

Die Figuren in “Mindset” mögen seltsam berühren, und es mag uns ärgern, diese fragile Männlichkeit, das Jammerige und Selbstmitleidige dieser jungen Männer zu sehen. Doch sie sind ein Spiegel unserer Gesellschaft, ein Spiegel, der uns die harte Wahrheit zeigt: dass wir in einer Welt leben, in der wir glauben, wir müssen studieren, um eine Daseinsberechtigung zu haben, dass wir in “Bullshit-Jobs” feststecken, die bis zum Punkt der Sinnlosigkeit effektiviert werden, dass wir auf Traumgewinne aus Krypto-Währungen warten, anstatt die Verantwortung für unser eigenes Leben zu übernehmen.

Doch was sagen wir diesen jungen Männern? Dass sie alt genug sind, um für sich selbst Verantwortung zu übernehmen. Dass es in Ordnung ist, ein “Schaf” zu sein, wenn das bedeutet, authentisch und ehrlich zu sich selbst und zu anderen zu sein. Dass es nicht darum geht, wie viel man hat, sondern wer man ist. Dass es nicht darum geht, ein “Wolf” zu sein, sondern darum, ein Mensch zu sein.

Und vielleicht, nur vielleicht, wenn wir aufhören, uns selbst zu betrügen, wenn wir aufhören, uns hinter dieser “Wolf”-Fassade zu verstecken, können wir beginnen, echten Erfolg zu erleben. Einen Erfolg, der nicht auf Penthäusern, großen Autos und dicken Uhren basiert, sondern auf Authentizität, Integrität und echtem menschlichem Mitgefühl.

Denn am Ende des Tages, was nützt es einem Mann, wenn er die ganze Welt gewinnt, aber seine Seele verliert?

Von den glitzernden Penthäusern bis zu den großen Autos, von den dicken Uhren bis zu den “Wölfen”, lassen Sie uns den Mut haben, die harte Wahrheit zu akzeptieren: dass es keine Abkürzung zum Erfolg gibt, dass “Fake it till you make it” nur ein hohler Slogan ist, und dass der einzige Weg zum wahren Erfolg darin besteht, authentisch zu sein, hart zu arbeiten und Verantwortung für unser eigenes Leben zu übernehmen.

Wir mögen nicht alle Wölfe sein, aber wir können alle Menschen sein. Und das ist mehr als genug.

https://www.n-tv.de/leute/buecher/Maenner-zwischen-Hoffnungslosigkeit-und-Selbstbetrug-article24227324.html

Instagram, one of the most popular social media platforms, has an intricate and complex terms of service agreement that every user needs to accept before using the platform. However, these terms can be extremely hard to understand for the average user, let alone younger audiences who also frequent the platform. A 2017 report called “Growing Up Digital” highlighted that essentially no children understood what they agreed to when signing up for Instagram. The terms of service, spanning 17 pages with 5,000 words, can be quite overwhelming for both kids and adults alike.

A Lawyer Simplifies the Terms

To address this issue, Jenny Afia, a privacy law expert at UK-based law firm Schillings, took it upon herself to simplify Instagram's terms of service for a younger audience. This was part of the “Growing Up Digital” report, and her version of the terms was written in language that children could understand. The revised version emphasized a few crucial points:

Instagram technically lets you own your original pictures and videos, but it also reserves the right to use them and let others use them worldwide. In some cases, Instagram may even get paid for allowing others to use your content, but you won't receive any compensation. Instagram may collect, use, and share your personal information with affiliated companies. This information can include your name, email address, school, location, pictures, phone number, your likes and dislikes, where you go, who your friends are, how often you use Instagram, and even your private messages. Instagram can send you advertisements related to your interests, which it monitors. You can't stop Instagram from doing this, and it won't always be clear that you're seeing an advertisement. Instagram reserves the right to change or end its services or block your access at any time, for any reason, without prior notice. It can also delete posts and other content randomly without telling you. If this happens, Instagram will not be responsible for paying out any money, and you won't have any right to complain. Instagram can force you to give up your username for any reason. Instagram can, but doesn't have to, remove, edit, block, and/or monitor anything posted or any accounts that it thinks break any of the platform's rules. If you break the rules, you're responsible, but Instagram is not responsible if someone else breaks the law or these rules.

The Impact and Implications

This simplified version of the terms was met with surprise from users. One 13-year-old girl commented that if the terms were easier to understand, people might think twice about using the app. Interestingly, it's not just kids who struggle to understand the terms. The report revealed that only people with postgraduate levels of education could fully comprehend Instagram's terms and conditions.

Afia believes that once people are more aware of what they're giving up, they might demand better terms. However, she also points out that most users aren't aware of what's being done with their data, so there's not a lot of pushback against these practices.

What Can Parents Do?

Parents have a key role to play in educating their children about these terms. The simplified privacy policy can be a good starting point for parents to discuss what their children are consenting to when using apps like Instagram. Parents can also find out what information companies have about their children and who they're sharing it with. However, few parents take advantage of this right.

There are several resources that parents can use to help guide their children's internet use:

The UK Safer Internet Centre has a “guide to technology” for parents. Net Aware offers a guide to popular apps that children use and rates them on their privacypolicy, among other things. The American Pediatric Family Media Plan provides a tool for planning children’s online time and other activities.

Policy Recommendations

The “Growing Up Digital” report also made three policy recommendations:

Create a compulsory “digital citizenship” program for children aged 4 to 14. This program wouldn't focus on coding and algorithms, which are currently taught, but on how to protect your rights online, how to respect others' rights, and how to manage online engagement. Implement the UK’s General Data Protection Regulation by writing terms and conditions in a way that children can understand. Create a new Children's Digital Ombudsman to liaise between parents and social media companies. These are ambitious proposals, and it remains to be seen how they would be implemented in practice. However, they highlight the importance of educating both children and adults about their digital rights and the implications of accepting terms and conditions online.

Overall, the issue of understanding terms of service agreements, especially for children, is a complex one that requires multi-faceted solutions involving education, policy changes, and increased transparency from social media companies.

Sources:

https://qz.com/878790/a-lawyer-rewrote-instagrams-terms-of-service-for-kids-now-you-can-understand-all-of-the-private-data-you-and-your-teen-are-giving-up-to-social-media

https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/5mq4cm/a_lawyer_rewrote_instagrams_terms_of_service_for/

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1288840/lawyer-simplifies-instagram-terms-conditions-young

https://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/lawyer-rewrote-instagrams-terms-use-kids-can-understand/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/parenting/wp/2017/01/08/a-lawyer-rewrote-instagrams-terms-of-use-in-plain-english-so-kids-would-know-their-privacy-rights/

https://www.denverpost.com/2017/01/09/instagrams-terms-of-use-plain-english/

https://connectsafely.org/